@InProceedings{SoaresKörtFons:2016:FiExUs,
author = "Soares, Anderson Reis and K{\"o}rting, Thales Sehn and Fonseca,
Leila Maria Garcia",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "First experiments using the image foresting transform (IFT)
algorithm for segmentation of remote sensing imagery",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2016",
organization = "GEOBIA 2016. : Solutions and Synergies",
publisher = "University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth
Observation (ITC)",
keywords = "Image Segmentation, Image Foresting Transform, Multiresolution
Segmentation, Segmentation Comparison.",
abstract = "Image segmentation is a traditional method in Remote Sensing and a
fundamental problem in image processing applications. It has been
widely used, especially with the emergence of the Geographic
Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA). The results of segmentation
must create uniform areas, which must allow a simpler
interpretation by the users and simpler representation for
classification algorithms. Several algorithms were proposed
through the years, using different approaches. One that is widely
used in Remote Sensing applications is the Multiresolution
algorithm, that is based on the region growing method. Other,
which has great potential and is applied in other research areas,
is available on the Image Foresting Transform (IFT) framework,
which has several image operators developed primarily for medical
images. The Watershed from Grayscale Marker operator uses an edge
image to perform the segmentation, however, we propose an
extension of the edge detection algorithm, by summing normalized
gradients of each band. This work aims to evaluate and compare
these two segmentation algorithms, by comparing their results
through supervised segmentation from reference regions, that were
defined manually by an expert user. Quality measures were
evaluated by four metrics, that represent the positional
adjustment based the center of gravity, intensities, size, and the
amount of overlap between the segment created by the algorithms
and the reference segment. We selected 21 objects of a WorldView-2
multispectral image that were used to compute the metrics. Both
methods reached similar results, by comparing the aforementioned 4
metrics applied to the 21 reference regions, IFT achieved better
results for majority of regions. The IFT generated segments with
similar shape when compared with the references, and the
multiresolution generated results with similar sizes and
positional adjustments. It may be explained by the fact that IFT
uses an edge image to perform the segmentation. Both algorithms
obtained similar agreement for intensity.",
conference-location = "Enschede",
conference-year = "14-16 sept.",
doi = "10.13140/RG.2.2.27778.27844",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27778.27844",
isbn = "9789036542012",
label = "lattes: 5186139934330175 1 SoaresK{\"o}rtFons:2016:FiExUs",
language = "en",
targetfile = "soares_first.pdf",
url = "http://proceedings.utwente.nl/441/",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}